Putting the Community back in to Radio Control
While I agree with most of what you're saying Zim, I'm sorry but (the highlighted part) is just plain misguided. There's no better way of encouraging people into these different disciplines than knowing what they're watching at a competition. They probably won't want to compete but it might encourage them to 'have a go'. Mark.
Hey MarkWhat I meant was that decisions must not be taken which put PERCEIVED spectator concerns ahead of running the events in the way most suited to finding the most deserving class champions. However, having some sort of spectator interface at each event is something which I have always supported. Some commentary on each line would definitely be of benefit to keep the spectators informed. But in the case of something like that, it is clearly something which is tacked on with no detriment to the event. Talking about moving events around based on miniscule perceived improvements to spectator convenience to the cost of good airspace planning just isn't worth considering. That's more what my point was aimed at.Z
your suggestion of "can't be bothered" shows an ignorance of how hard those involved work to make the event a success.
Big A, I recognise fully that there are some very very hard working people involved with the NATS, yourself included. I have seen from being on the front line, albeit some years ago but the venue and task are still the same what a mammoth exersise it is to not just set up and clear down but also to run. I take nothing away from the hard workers, but as you must agree, not everyone in the BMFA is as hard working and has there ears open to suggestion do they? That is where my gripe is aimed at. I am quite sure if someone very high up in the BMFA took some time to ask the simple question "we are going to produce some signs and boards explaining what happens on your line to those that don't know, what do you want on it?" then the CD's can reply and then the BMFA get them made so they are uniform and don't look like a primary school did them.It isn't rocket science, and I understand that every time the BMFA get a mention that you feel the need to defend them, that is obvious but I am sure that everyone here recognises your input. For example when you created the "BMFA Classified Rep" account, was that of your own back or was that a "Head Office" idea? - I don't think you need to answer this. If the hobby is going to attract new members then they need to welcome and embrace and not shut them out, it takes vision and pro-activity to do this. It is a good job that allot of clubs require BMFA membership, I wonder how many members there would be if it wasn't needed?Sheridan
[snip]I take nothing away from the hard workers, but as you must agree, not everyone in the BMFA is as hard working and has there ears open to suggestion do they? That is where my gripe is aimed at. I am quite sure if someone very high up in the BMFA took some time to ask the simple question "we are going to produce some signs and boards explaining what happens on your line to those that don't know, what do you want on it?" then the CD's can reply and then the BMFA get them made so they are uniform and don't look like a primary school did them.[/snip]
That is semantics, to the non hobby general public who attend it is a show because that is how it is marketed.
But this point is being raised from a spectator point of view.And why would spectators solely interested in control line events be reading an RC forum?No data, just look at the spectatorsNo data....... I think that someone else on this thread said that there were more spectators at CL than IMAC. Given those conflicting reports I was interested to know if you had any hard data [/b] Well as 'a professional statistician' you shouldn't have to ask, it would in my view be all of them... Am I right?No - unless you're saying that they could all lie??? I guess I must be missing your point
I'm sure the pylon boys can put together something for next year, if fact i fthey can decide on the info, i'll print an A board up at work for it
Steve Holland and Richard Rawle are the pilots, i'm sure they'd be more than happy to hear from one of the actual pilots. Someone is bound to have contact details for them on here.. Steve is on the forum, i'll check for his usernameChris
Pity about the weather as I would have liked to have seen the free flight
Page created in 0.954 seconds with 26 queries.